Past lives; Brother

Past lives

One of the very best films I’ve seen this year – perhaps the best. A perfectly handled love-triangle, where the perfection lies in nothing changing: the existing relationships remain as they are – no marriages ruined, no friendships shattered. Everything is respected, everything held in tension. In the final scene (with which the film, stunningly, also opens), any one of the three protagonists could have destroyed everything by going off on one; instead they all three, separately, hold it together.

The final tears from the woman are the exception that proves the rule, an incident which reveals the intensity of emotion in all three, but which damages nothing, as they come after the successful non-event.

Brother

The trailer scared me with the hero Michael’s older brother (Francis) getting his sibling to climb an electricity pylon, exhorting him to follow his every move exactly, to avoid getting electrocuted. At the end of the film you see them at the top. But the metaphor is a good one for two Black boys growing up in this part of Toronto. A foot (or hand) wrong and that’s it. Their mother Ruth plays a similar role to Francis in the strong care she has for her sons.

For Deadline Hollywood, Valerie Complex wrote that “Brother is a film that reaffirms why I love movies. The narrative asks so many vital questions about Black life and masculinity, but most of all: If Black boys are raising themselves to adulthood, where do they turn for support? This is the ultimate dilemma Francis and Michael find themselves in. Brother isn’t just another “Black” film. This is a vital piece of cinema that hasn’t received the buzz it deserves. I don’t want to see this fly under the radar, and I hope others will be open-minded enough to witness the genius of Clement Virgo and these young actors.”

How they are related

The strength and resolve which Francis shows in his care for his younger brother reminds me of that shown by all three protagonists in Past Lives. Both films are (yuk) testimonies to the power of the human spirit to persevere in kindness. In both, a foot wrong was all it would have taken.

Both films also handle absence in contrary ways: in Past Lives, it’s the return of presence (of her childhood friend) which threatens to destroy her current life; in Brother it’s Francis’s absence which throws Michael and Ruth’s lives into instability.

Posted in Film | Tagged | Leave a comment

Afire; Passages

Afire

A German film about a writer on a writing retreat by the Baltic. He’s not a very pleasant person, so his relationships don’t work out – people don’t like him very much. As his story develops there’s a parallel thread of approaching forest fires, which eventually threaten where they are staying, and lead to the deaths of two of the party. A nice correlative to the emotional damage caused by the writer’s selfishness.

Passages

A film about a film director, who is not a very pleasant person. He’s in a relationship with Ben Wishaw (well, his character), but then falls for a young woman, leaves Ben and shacks up with her. He then tries to keep Ben by sleeping with him again, but eventually the woman and Ben meet up and realise what an unpleasant person the director is. The film ends with the director cycling madly through Paris trying to patch up the mess of his own making.

How they are related

Unpleasant blokes messing up their relationships.

What’s more interesting is the contrast between Passages and Past Lives: two love-triangles, one perfectly held together by all three protagonists, the other all over the place through the selfishness of one of them.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Asteroid City; L’Immensità

Asteroid City

My first solo film of the Curzon cult membership; the day after Barbie with a group: good feelings.

Continue reading
Posted in Film, sci-fi | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Oppenheimer; Barbie: Frankenheimer?

Bit of a cliché this, but…

How they are related

Both films construct worlds – Barbieland and Los Alamos. So Oppenheimer is Ruth Handler; for Barbie is as much her story as anyone else’s.

Both are about the discovery of a new weapon – the atomic bomb and patriarchy. So Oppenheimer is also Ken.

And in both these weapons are used, with devastating consequences. The world then recoils in shock and works to prevent their re-use. Détente begins, and the women replace the temporary patriarchy with a looser form of gynaecocracy.

Gloria and Sasha are the people from the real world who travel to Barbieland and help sort things out. But what’s the role of ordinary people in Oppenheimer, other than the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

What’s really interesting when setting these two alongside each other – and this is surely the reason for the humorous combined memes – is that each typifies a particularly gendered style. Oppenheimer is a classic male – scientist, clever, determined, an outside, an individual – as against, er, Barbie. The gender battle on the beach at the end of Barbie must have been based on this Mail on Sunday commercial from 2007.

As for the name ‘Barbenheimer’, wouldn’t it have been great if Ken was called Frank: we could then call it ‘Frankenheimer’ – a lot more Gothic. But Barbenheimer itself retains the gendered distinction whereby women are referred to by first names, men by surnames. Might a useful reversal be Robohandler? Hasn’t got the same ring about it, but I guess that’s my point.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

gods and robots, by adrienne mayor

very excited to find this in the london library – a book exploring the anticipations of robots and ai in ancient mythology and literature, especially greek

i’d always thought hephaestus’ robot servants were amazing

Anyway, the book told me loads of myths I hadn’t heard of, like how Medea and Jason disposed of Talus, the great robot who defended Crete for Minos; after a load of myths mayor then intelligently discusses parallels and differences between these ancient archetypes and contemporary developments in ai and robotics

She’s interesting on the distinction between monsters which were born, and those which were made: it seems that this developed after the earliest tales – presumably as the skill of engineers made fictional artificial monsters more conceivable

Posted in Stuff | Leave a comment

acqua alta and the abc murders

acqua alta by donna leon

there must be few detective stories like this one, with no twist, but it was ok as i recognised some of the places in venice, enjoyed the recent real acqua alta, and the novel ends quite (with deliberate ambiguity) beautifully

the abc murders by agatha christie / bbc

john malkovich as hercule poirot; pilloried for murdering a belgian accent but it sounded french enough for me what more do they want

altogether excellent – particularly the plot in fact – one of those rare detective novels where you’re fooled until the end but then kick yourself for not spotting the clues in plain sight – donna leon nota bene

How they are related

They are both detective novels. I’ve tried, but that’s as far as it goes.

Posted in Novel, TV | Leave a comment

les miserables and die hard

les miserables

what is it about les mis? four brilliant tunes, an epic plot rattled through at 200 novel-pages a minute, a series of injustices and pathetic deaths ending in those of the protagonists: the baddy jumping off a bridge, and the goody going off to heaven

the guy in the toilets afterwards told me it was his tenth visit, and made darn sure he told me; this is the kind of show that brings people back

it’s growing on me, as i move from an unfortunate highbrow sneer (that’s too nasty a word but you know what i mean) to a desire to wallow in it again – the tunes are so hummable and the story so vast – it’s a kind of cross between some great epic you need years to get into and the cheesiest tear-jerking pop song: if you can take the best of these, not the worst, you’ll end up telling strangers in the toilets how many times you’ve seen it

die hard

bucket list one item shorter

what a fun movie

but how seriously anti-cop too, and not just in the incompetent-plod way, but the big cops who fly in on helicopters are really evil

one nice ordinary guy in a vest (and the one decent ordinary cop outside) against both groups of bad guys – beautiful – this is A MYTH

How they are related

They appear at first glance to be myths of very different scales, but both in fact are similar in experienced-time – if not in plot-time. Both take a couple of hours give or take, but the fun at the plaza is of an evening, not a lifetime.

Both also are ‘icons’/memes/legends/things-some-people-have-seem-umpteen-times, and both star a valiant and honourable male hero, pitted against forces of evil represented by state officials. Both heroes end as saints. And at the moment I prefer Bruce.

Posted in Film, musical | 1 Comment

a fish called wanda and brief answers to the big questions by stephen hawking

a fish called wanda

some great moments, but overall disappointing; (‘sir’) michael palin’s stutter is always a little painful, but it was the (to modern eyes) slow editing which got me – and the sexism – both made it seem surprisingly dated

we always thought this would be a great film for today’s kidz, but i’m not so sure; when you compare it to the pegg trilogy, for example, it scrubs up as closer to a bedroom farce or an ealing comedy – and less funny/imaginative/well made

brief answers to the big questions

some great moments, but overall disappointing; stephen hawking (‘cbe’) ’s smugness is always a little painful, but it was the poor editing which got me – it’s a book hastily got together before the great man died, and suffers from repetitiveness and errors (i forget what they were) – but it’s not properly edited

pretty amazing though on the time-black-holes-wow-the-universe stuff, and clearly put for the ignorant (i speak from experience)

on the god question, his argument seems to run:

  1. there are inviolable laws of nature
  2. these laws govern everything
  3. therefore there is nothing not governed by laws of nature
  4. god can’t be governed by laws of nature
  5. therefore there can be no god

premises 1 & 2 seem uncertain, and, even if sound, the argument has force only against a mechanical ‘first mover’ creator and sustainer of the universe

his argument seems to remove our free will too, yet he seems quite happy with our having that

How they are related

Apart from both being surprisingly disappointing in different ways, might there be a black hole in Wanda? Something from which nothing escapes, not even light? What is Wanda? She’s Ken’s (Palin’s) special fish, named after Jamie Lee Curtis’ character, whom Ken fancies. Ken hides the key (to the safe where the loot is hidden) in the pirate treasure chest in Wanda’s tank. Her lover gets info out of Ken by eating his fish in front of him: Ken breaks just before Wanda is eaten, so she is saved. Ken is an animal lover, and one of the film’s running jokes is how he, ordered to kill an old lady who identified his boss, accidentally kills her three dogs instead. It is all very funny. So no black hole in Wanda, but something like a black hole in Hawkings’ reductive theology.

Posted in Film, Reading | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

the song of the sea & bohemian rhapsody

the song of the sea

a chunkily animated irish folk-tale cartoon about a lighthouse-keeper, his selkie (seal-mermaid) lover, and their children; set in modern ireland, the story tells of children discovering their parents’, and their own, identities

it’s beautiful to watch, and from start to finish soaked, sunken, in irish music

bohemian rhapsody

the reviewers were right: a weak script – sentimental, sometimes cringy, and (i learnt later) not even historically accurate (e.g. freddie never left queen, to return for live aid); but – magical in its re-creation of the 70s, and of the live aid performance; ‘doing alright’ performed pre-mercury at a student gig was amazing to watch – something from the little-known first album, but containing all the elements of later queen – beautiful tune, rapid changes, hard rock

How they are related

Mercury as an Irish fairy – beautiful, vulnerable but with a deep power – mercurial? Well… Certainly both are about the power of music: in the Queen film, when you see the audiences rhythmically chanting and swaying with Freddie, particularly at Live Aid, you realise how music grabs us, and how skilfully Mercury operated those grabs.

‘[The Song of the Sea] tells of children discovering their parents’, and their own, identities’ – OK – one of the narrative frames of Bohemian Rhapsody is the move from his mother’s initial incomprehension of her son and her later proud acceptance, and some of the film’s sense is Freddie’s discovering his gay identity, and how his particular lifestyle within this killed him.

Posted in Film | Leave a comment

the ape that understood the universe by steve stewart-williams and the dallas buyers guide

the ape that understood the universe by steve stewart-williams

long-windedly and irritatingly covers the ground: first Darwinian natural selection of GENES, taking an explicitly and alternately triumphant and apologetic counter-zeitgeist stance that more of human nature is biological, genetic, than we think – more nature than nurture; he’s against the blank-slate tabula-rasa brigade

Continue reading

Posted in Film, Reading | Leave a comment