[SPOILER ALERT] Furst’s hero Zannis is hard-working, principled, hunky, honest, pragmatic, successful, respected by Greek and foreigner, and human, yet (significant to our final inability to fuse with him) unflawed. I think it’s the fact that he actually gets away safe at the end, eluding the invading Germans, which makes this clear, although to have him killed would be deeply disappointing. In other respects Furst’s story shares Le Carré’s preference for character over action, but deals differently with the building of tension: Le Carré’s story (or at least the one I read recently) has one situation which we know must end somehow; Furst’s has multiple situations set against the background of an inevitable German invasion. It’s a delightful read, and I feel guilty for feeling slightly let down at the end.
- Abortion Aeneid Aeschylus aesthetics Aidan Andrew Dun Alexander Allingham Antigone Art Blake Bowie Brideshead Christianity Comedy Conrad death drama Eliot English epic ethics Feminism Fleet Forster French Godot Gormenghast Greek Greek history Hartley historiography history Homer Iliad Jesus Larkin literary theory Literature London love Modernism Montaigne Music myth Mythology Oedipus Philip Gross Philosophy Plato poetry politics post-modernism Protagoras psychogeography Quakers Religion Romance Roman history Sayers Sex Socrates Sophocles Theology Theseus The Wind in the Willows thriller Tragedy Travel Troy Truman Show Virgil War Wilde Wimsey World War II