I’d no idea what to expect: I knew he’d written The French Lieutenant’s Woman, but had neither read nor seen that. I (still) don’t even know if he’s British or American. But this book is long-lasting in its effects for two reasons. First is the way it’s written: most of it is in dialogue form – transcriptions of interviews carried out by a lawyer (Henry Ayscough) in 1736, and these are biting and subtle; but the occasional pieces of straight narrative, including the lengthy initial scene, are in a style I haven’t met before: fabulously careful and detached accounts of every action and gesture, including the absence of actions and gestures, by the characters. As for the story itself, it’s an 18th-century thriller, involving disguise, deceit and, either time travel, aliens, or some seriously bizarre religious visions. It’s a shifting, clever, piece: who the main character actually is (in terms of which of the characters is actually the main one) emerges gradually, and we don’t really know for sure until the epilogue.
- Abortion
- Aeneid
- Aeschylus
- aesthetics
- Aidan Andrew Dun
- Alexander
- Ancient History
- animal rights
- Antigone
- Art
- Blake
- Bowie
- Christianity
- Comedy
- death
- drama
- Eliot
- epic
- ethics
- Feminism
- Fleet
- Forster
- Geography
- Godot
- Greek
- Greek history
- Green
- historiography
- history
- Homer
- Iliad
- Jesus
- Larkin
- literary theory
- Literature
- London
- love
- meaning of life
- migration
- Modernism
- Montaigne
- Music
- myth
- Mythology
- Oedipus
- Philip Gross
- Philosophy
- Plato
- poetry
- politics
- post-modernism
- Protagoras
- psychogeography
- Quakers
- Religion
- Romance
- Roman history
- Science
- sculpture
- Sebald
- Sex
- Socrates
- Sophocles
- Theology
- Theseus
- thriller
- Tragedy
- Travel
- Troy
- Truman Show
- Virgil
- War
- Wilde
- Wittgenstein
- World War II
He’s British. All of his novels have very “clever” aspects, plot twists, modern deconstructive self-awareness intrusions, and erudite word play. But what does your review have to do with Quakers and Shakers?
Thanks. And good point about the tags: I’d entered them before writing the “review”. The book’s heroine is in fact the mother of the founder of the Shakers, something I didn’t mention when I actually wrote it up.