“What we did on our holidays”

[Spoiler alert – this is really meant for people who’ve seen the film]

Official trailer line “Explores the meaning of life and suggests how best to live and love.” Fair enough.

A brilliantly made, written and acted comedy based on the Outnumbered idea of modern mad dysfunctional-but-ultimately-aren’t-we-all family. About how kids and the old have got it right (carpe diem, live adventurously) and the adults in the middle have either sold out to Mammon or are deluded by pressures of work and social expectation. So Billy Connolly and the kids on the beach are where it’s at, and Gavin’s stupid tense Four-Weddings faux-Scottish party are where it’s not.

The ending seemed all too quick and easy, until you realise that the whole film is a comedy, with all that implies: cut-out characters, artifice, and the need for a happy resolution. It ends very Greekly, with the oldest kid delivering the adults a deus-ex-machina lecture from above (μηχανη (the crane) = the staircase), whereupon all four of the useless adults realise what fools they’ve been and everything is sorted. The final funeral eulogies on the cliff falter, and swiftly descends/ascends into a traditional Aristophanic κωμος or revel.

Gordie’s death halfway though, as Sophocles’ Ajax, starts the important debate about what to do about it: the Gordian Knot.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Donna Leon: “Through a glass darkly”

Another Donna. Madonna of the laguna, of sumptuous meals with named wines, of the affection of Paola and Elettra, the two women fusing to channel the author’s love for her hero, as Sayers’ for Wimsey and Allingham’s for Campion.

Madonna of the telefonino. Why use the Italian word for ‘mobile phone’ throughout without writing the whole damn thing in Italian? Did the Italians invent the mobile? Vino I could understand.

And who would be so stupid as to not recognise that “49° 29.52” wasn’t likely to be a coordinate? Especially an intelligent senior policeman.

Anyway, I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Posted in Novel | Leave a comment

Leon Uris: “Exodus”

Fascinating. Published in 1959, not long after the events it describes, this self-proclaimed epic novel tells the story of the foundation of the state of Israel in 1948. It claims all the ‘events’ are true, but the characters are fictional, and are not intended to represent real people. I’m too ignorant of the history to comment on Uris’ success either with his facts or with his fictionalising, but if at least most of the book represents what happened then it’s an eye-opening story. Continue reading

Posted in Novel | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ben Aaronovitch: “The Rivers of London”

A standard and fun modern tongue-in-cheek crime/mystery story, uplifted by being set in a magical-realist London where the eponymous (a word never to be used in serious writing) rivers of the eponymous capital city have deities who are alive and active.

It’s been a few months since I read it, so I’ve completely forgotten the crime plot, but can remember vividly the goddesses of the Brent and the Fleet, and Old Father Thames himself. Reminds me of the Douglas Adams book (one of his Dirk Gently series?) where the London homeless are in fact the old Norse gods, and slowly one wonderful night converge on their Valhalla – King’s Cross station.

I wonder if the Percy Jackson books are similar?

Posted in Novel | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Gary L. Francione: “An Introduction to Animal Rights”

A powerfully argued, technical and persuasive book: if you think it’s OK to eat animals and wear their skins then best not to read it.

Francione’s argument is in two stages. First he reiterates Bentham’s view that animals suffer, so have a moral interest in not being made to suffer. This seems to be the prevailing consensus from Bentham onwards through Peter Singer to today’s laws against, for example, some aspects of factory farming. Secondly he argues that there can be no substantial alleviation of their suffering so long as animals are seen as the legal property of humans: the rights of the human owner to derive economic benefit from her animals will always trump the (albeit acknowledged) rights of the animals not to suffer.

Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“The Rings of Saturn” by W.G. Sebald

A chance find on the bookshelves of a holiday cottage in Staithes. Ten short chapters.
I’d heard of the author, but that only: I didn’t even know he was German. If I had I might have been put off, as translations for me often jar, but this one (by Michael Hulse) never did; from the off it was like reading a novel by an outstanding English writer and stylist.
The novel describes a (real, I take it) walking tour the author undertook through Suffolk (although German by birth he was a professor in Norwich), from Lowestoft to Ditchingham. Sebald uses what he sees and finds as springboards for stories from history, illustrated with photographs and beautifully told. There’s an encyclopaedic feel as you move from the walk to an account of different places and times, back to the walk, then to somewhere else. These stories are usually depressing: about suffering in wars & battles (e.g. Waterloo), the suffering of herring as they died in their billions, the unfulfilled love between the French writer and diplomat Châteaubriand and a Suffolk rector’s daughter, the torments in the lives of writers such as Conrad, Fitzgerald and Swinburne, and the reclusive (and truly shattered) final years of Major George Wyndham Le Strange, the allied commander who liberated Belsen. Places take the stage too: the collapse of Dunwich into the North Sea, the destruction of trees in the 1987 storm, and the bleak post-military wasteland of Orford Ness. Throughout, the evils of the Third Reich are never far beneath the surface, and I suspected as I read that many of the stories were symbolic treatments of this; I was reminded of George Steiner’s argument (in Silence) that the only proper response to the Holocaust is just that – silence (silence and motionlessness are recurrent themes in Sebald’s book); I was reading the book as a muted indirect response to Nazism, and I think in many ways it is. One of the few positive episodes is an encounter with a farmer called Thomas Abrams, who, to the neglect of his farm, has devoted decades to the construction of a large model of the Jewish temple in Jerusalem at the time of Christ; yet even this is tinged with regret, through Abrams’ fears that his model will never be finished, and through our knowledge of the Temple’s then-imminent destruction by the Romans, and European Jewry’s near destruction by the Nazis. A particularly upsetting passage describes the murders carried out by the Croatian Ustasha in WWII, which implicitly fingers former UN General Secretary Kurt Waldheim with, at the least, clear knowledge of what was going on. Continue reading

Posted in Novel, Translation | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Karen Armstrong: “Compassion”

Another book I read so long ago I can’t really remember the details. Hey ho.

I read this as part of a discussion group with the Quakers – a chapter a week. Armstrong’s impressive – a muscular thinker and speaker – though as a writer she can spell things out a little too fully for my taste: think PEEL. The book is partly a historical survey, attempting to demonstrate the centrality of compassion (embodied in what she calls the Golden Rule (‘do to others how you would be done by’, or it’s converse ‘don’t do to others what you wouldn’t want them to do to you’)) to all the world’s religions/faith traditions/spiritualities. And it’s also a devotional, self- (or rather ‘others-‘) help book, with exercises, for the reader to use to help them become more compassionate. It’s also a plug for Armstrong’s Compassion Charter [sub eds please check] – an attempt, backed by representatives of all major religions, to enshrine the Golden Rule in the heart of all religious teaching; a reaction, no doubt, to the apparent dangers of deepening religious divides and conflict.

Posted in Philosophy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Anabase” by St-John Perse

The book in question is T.S. Eliot’s translation of this 1920 French poem, with the original text on facing pages. Also included are several prefaces and forewords from other editions, all translated into English. I bought it many years ago because of Eliot’s name on the front, and, I think, read it, but not much stuck. For a time I thought Eliot had himself written the French, and then made up St-John Perse as a bit of a joke, but he (Perse) does have his own entry in Wikipedia, and, apparently, won the Nobel Prize for Literature, so if it is a hoax it’s an elaborate one. But perhaps he is made up: “Perse” could (wittily) refer to the Persians Xenophon was marching for (see below), or (even more subtly) Latin “per se” “by himself” (geddit?). Mmmm… Continue reading

Posted in Poetry | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Herodotus’ Histories

My previous experience of Herodotus had been, as for many classicists, that of reading isolated episodes, either as set texts for teaching Greek GCSE, or as passages for unseen translation. I’d also read some of his stories in secondary literature, for example Psammetichus’ language experiment, or closely followed his account (without fully realising it) when listening to lectures on the Persian Wars. So I’d expected the popular distinction between Thucydides the proper historian – focused, intellectual, dry, and Herodotus the fascinated, travelling round the Mediterranean writing down funny stories, more anthropologist and geographer than historian. Well, he is, much more than Thucydides, anthropologist and geographer (and as such is enjoying a greater reputation among scholars today than those of fifty years ago), but in no way is he not a historian. I’d expected a rambling work, drifting from topic to topic, but from start to finish he is clear in his aims: to tell the history of the Greco-Persian wars, preceded by an account of how the Persian Empire became so dangerous in the first place. Continue reading

Posted in History, Translation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Poetry Review 104:2 Summer 2014

Philip Gross is always very interesting (e.g. Deep Field), so I was pleased that the first three poems in this edition were his. The first, “The Players” is a brilliantly subtle evocation of the causes and ramifications of the First World War; so subtle, indeed, that it might not be about that at all. Two old men play chess in a Central European café; every thirty years or so there’s a bang, when “all the combinations shatter / into flight, up // over rooftops, dewlapped gables, weather vanes, / to reform, circle, circle, homing / on wherever we may be.” This aside, what I really like about all Gross’ poems is the pleasure I get from reading them, from the pacing, from the way thoughts begin, develop and shift. His strength for me is this portrayal, a live demonstration, of careful [Quakery] thinking.

Continue reading

Posted in Poetry | Tagged , , | Leave a comment